Wednesday, June 6, 2012

cine interactivo +Martel


I met (figuratively speaking) Vincent Morrisset becuase we are both fans of Arade Fire and Sigur Ros. I have not been able to see his other films but Bla bla blew my mind. It is a film to be seen in a computer. there is an interesting temptation of the unconscious in it. The idea of game and chance is extremely dadaits. There has been much written about the new vanguards today, but I just feel that cinema is is travelling back to the future. If you have 10 minutes (yeah, its a short film) watch it with the mouse in your hand.








Morrisset was featured in the Wired magazine early this year. Described as a web-friendly director, he is said to have taken a step aside -more than a step forward- in filmmaking. Steping aside. That’s a concept that helps me think a lot about my project, which discusses Lucrecia Martel's post-2008 films –the ones pasted in my last post-.  




Very broadly speaking, I assert that Martel articulates a "surrealist para-space for women agency". The central point of my thesis is that she produces a self-decapitation in order to create an alternative space (a para-space) outside of hegemonic discourse (connected to surrealism, this para-space, is presented in the form of gestures).





Surrealism and the para-space it fosters, relates back to the historical  vanguards. Here I think of Fernanado Rosenberg


“From this position, Latin American avant-gardes could undertake a critique of modernity and its narratives,  including those of “international”3modernism and its avant-gardes, but along a different axis, not through rushing the temporalities of progress forward or through a return to primitive origins. Instead, they developed narratives of space that articulated the Latin American situation in a shifting world order. Some European avant-gardes movements (cubism, dadaism, surrealism, etc.) attempted to undermine the legacy of the Enlightenment and its foundation in the white man as the model of rationality and historical agency under the direction of universal, abstract progress. Because of their investment in modernity and their peripheral position in its foundational narratives, however, Latin Americans were forced to level their criticism through and with a particular attentiveness to spatial issues that addressed this problematic inclusion but that were repressed by the same idea of progress that they embraced.” (my emphasis, 2)





No comments:

Post a Comment